We Evaluate AI Systems In Production

Your AI doesn’t run in a lab. Neither should your evaluations. 

AI isn’t traditional software

it’s dynamic, complex, and unpredictable, running in multi-tiered supply chains. Its code carries promise but also risks and liability. Rogue AI can result in performance errors, inefficiencies, reputational risk, financial losses, and compliance gaps.

We help you build the AI risk management evidence that leadership and regulators actually require.

We give you back control.

Independent evaluations of AI systems since 2012

Clients across 4 continents

Benchmarks from 15+ industries. 200+ systems evaluated

Whatever your system, we evaluate it end-to-end in its real environment

Expert & predictive systems

Classifiers, scoring models, and decision-support tools. We evaluate data quality, threshold logic, explainability, bias across populations, and whether human review actually changes outcomes. ‍

LLM-based systems

Generative AI, RAG pipelines, and AI-assisted workflows. We evaluate hallucination rates, output explainability , retrieval quality, prompt safety, output consistency, and data leakage risk.

Agentic systems

Autonomous agents, multi-step pipelines, and tool-using models. We evaluate action traceability, goal alignment, failure modes, and whether human oversight is adequate for the level of autonomy granted. ‍

Real clients. All verticals. Real impact.

Independent

Why Eticas

With no interest in the outcome, we objectively quantify any risk.

Socio-technical

We evaluate the full system: data, model, business rules, software, people and process.

Powered by Tech

Proprietary methodology and tech built over more than a decade of auditing systems in production.

Guided by Experts

Evaluating AI since 2012. We don’t stop at metrics. We give you the evidence and guidance to act.

We deliver where others stop

Governance Platforms: Track policies & checklists 

Observability Tools: Track technical metrics 

Audit Firms: Deliver one-off reports

Eticas: Continuous, independent, socio-technical evaluation in production

Outcomes of good AI assurance vs poor practice

With Independent Evaluation: 

  • Safe, trustworthy AI adoption 

  • Client and user confidence 

  • Risk Mitigation and explainability 

  • Successful AI Integration 

  • Access to Insurance 

Without Independent Evaluation

  • Hidden harms surfacing in the wild  

  • Costly remediation and wasted effort

  • Reputation risk  

  • Legal liability